Comics
are for kids. As much as some people try
and tell you otherwise, comics are for kids.
Think about the heyday of comic books (before the speculator bubble
burst in the 90’s), who was collecting comics at that time? Primarily kids! Comics didn’t pander to the children at that
time either. They just crafted good
stories and entire universes that were relatively accessible to children. A kid could go to the local grocery store or
newsstand at the mall and pick up a random issue of a comic book, read it, and
want to come back for more. They didn’t
have to read the previous four to five issues to get caught up on the story
arc, they didn’t have to be fully immersed in the universe to understand what
was going on, and they didn’t need to collect every title on the newsstand
itself in order to get a complete tale.
Comics were good, they were accessible and they were successful.
Nowadays,
it seems like comic books have been divided into two different distinct
formats. All of the comics that we grew
up with (the big-two superhero stuff for the most part) have grown up with
us. The stories are darker, more mature,
and more inclusive than ever before. This
is fine as there is obviously a market for that. The problem with that scenario though is that
as those comics grew up, nothing with any real staying power grew in its place,
to solidify a hold on the kid market.
There are a few comics here and there that do a good job, but many are
by independent publishers and don’t necessarily get the coverage that those
from the big two do. Instead, we get
comics that are marketed strictly for kids.
This is fine except that where old comics from the 80’s would tell their
stories in a kid-friendly environment, many “Young Reader” or “All-Ages” comics
nowadays seem to go with a simple, dumbed-down story, playing down to the
audience instead of raising the bar and expecting the readers to meet it. There are some exceptions to this as well,
but as someone that has read a lot of “kid-friendly” comics in his search for
something to ignite a passion for the medium in his own children; I think I can
safely say that many comics geared toward kids are pretty bad.
I
decided to give it another go though, as Sesame Street #1 arrived today from
Ape Entertainment.
Cover:
First
of all, there are six covers. Six. For a kid’s book. I assume that they are all interlocking
covers of the Sesame Street characters that form a large picture of the cast,
but honestly the idea of standing in a comic shop, having to argue with my kid
that the comic with Big Bird on it is the exact same thing as the comic with
Cookie Monster on it is not something I want to think about. Having to explain a marketing strategy that
led to my favorite medium’s near demise to my son is not something that I
really want to do at this point. Maybe
in a few years.
Aside
from the marketing ploy, if I was to base the cover on its own merits I would
have to say that it does the job. It’s a
brightly colored cover that seems to not only get the physical aspects of the
characters presented (on mine it was Big Bird, Telly Monster and Baby Bear) but
also the personality. Sure, we’re
talking about puppets here, but if you grew up with Sesame Street (as I did)
you know that everyone has a distinct “voice”.
The way they are drawn here by Amy Mebberson really plays on that. You can see that she has referenced the
source material for more than just style guides on how to draw the
characters. This is actually very
consistent throughout the book itself from all of the artist and writers. I can’t say too much more about it. It doesn’t tell a story per se, but it’s a #1
issue and the main idea should be inviting children to look inside, which is
just the case with this cover.
9/10 – If I was judging it on the marketing strategy it
would be much lower, but as a cover,
great stuff. Mebberson nails it.
Story:
The
book, much like an episode of Sesame Street, is broken up into multiple
stories. I could easily see this as an
actual episode of the television series and it’s impressive in that it feels
like a natural piece of the Sesame Street puzzle and not homage to the show. There are multiple writers here, so I will
give a brief rundown of their contributions.
Jason M. Burns handles three stories and they feel like the most “Sesame
Street” of the stories involved, like they were transported straight out of the
show itself (except for the initial “How to Read Comics” story, which is
incredibly helpful for first-time readers.
Paul Morrissey writes a tale of Oscar the Grouch that deals more with
imagination than it does with teaching, but that’s okay with me. Comic books are about imagination and the
writers use that to their advantage here as that is one of the driving forces
of the show as well. Patrick Storck
writes a short Cookie Monster piece that I swear I have seen before on the
actual show, okay maybe not the exact story, but something very close. Then we have two stories from Jay
Fosgitt. They are each little one-pagers
but they give a nice silly little respite from the larger stories and introduce
characters (The Count, Snuffleupagus) that are not in the comic in any other
story.
There
is a great balance of characters here as well.
The “big” story (the one that would lead off the show) focuses on Elmo
and Grover (as Super Grover) but after that they are not seen from again. I have no idea how they decided on putting
the comic together but this could have easily become an Elmo-centric comic
based on his popularity and the ease in writing a “kid learning about the world
around him” kind of story. I am not an
Elmo fan myself, and I know that I would be turned off by the book if it was
just twenty-two pages of Elmo. I hope this
trend of variety continues as there is pretty much something for everyone
here. The writing definitely plays down
to the young child element that is the target audience, but I have less of a
problem with this than I would if the book was about superheroes or something along
those lines. The way it was written
really does fall into line with the way the show “feels” and as I said before,
it definitely feels like an extension and not just a cash grab.
8/10 – It does the job well, from telling young readers how
to read a comic, to transporting them to Sesame Street itself, the writing is
spot-on, and I dare you to read this without doing the voices in your
head.
Art:
There’s
a list of artists longer than the list of writers, and they each bring a bit of
their own flair to each individual story.
Scott Ball illustrates the opening piece and does a decent job, though
Elmo looks a bit creepy at times. I realize
on the show that the eyes are fixed in the middle, but it looks like Elmo was
dropped on his head one too many times.
Amy Mebberson illustrates the “big” story and does an exceptional job
capturing both the likeness of Elmo and Grover, as well as their
personalities. The way the characters
act is on par with what we would expect had we sat down to watch the television
series. Scott Underwood on the Oscar the
Grouch story and James Silvani on the Cookie Monster story do a decent job as
well. Fosgitt illustrates the stories
that he wrote, and while his illustrations are a tad stylized, they are still
instantly recognizable and ten times cuter than anything else in the book. You can definitely see his style poking
through ever so slightly. The final
story is illustrated in the claymation style of the Bert and Ernie’s Great
Adventure portion of the program. In a
lot of ways, Sesame Street has gone downhill from where I remember it when I
was growing up, but Bert and Ernie’s Great Adventure is one of the high points
of the current iteration. The fact that
they were able to get the claymation for the comic (whether it’s traditional or
done digitally I don’t know) adds to the feel that this is just another
episode.
I'd say 'poor Elmo' but he had it coming.
The acting, the movement, Mebberson nails it all on this, probably my favorite panel of the whole book.
Fosgitt bringing his own, distinct style to one of my favorites, The Count!
The best part about the new episodes of the television show continues that tradition here.
7/10 – A very good effort from all of the artists
involved. They stayed as true to the characters
as the writers did and added to the quality of the book itself.
Overall: 8/10 – The fact
that my four year old’s eyes lit up when I showed it to him told me everything
I needed to know. A phenomenal effort on
a comic specifically designed for children, which I don’t feel bad reading to
them.
No comments:
Post a Comment