-Nik Magill
For quite some time now I have been
an adoring fan of Alec Baldwin. I think he's a brilliant actor, has impeccable
comedic timing, and is an all-around talented individual in whatever he takes
on.
For
example, he has a podcast that's been going for a couple months now, called Here's
the Thing, where he just interviews people. Celebrities, politicians,
newsmakers; all with a new, insightful light to interviews that one would never
find with someone like Barbara Walters. Baldwin makes things personal, and his
interviewees just open up as if they were chatting in a cafe over an espresso
and a danish. Here's the Thing isn't the point of this article, but I
strongly suggest you check it out if you have access to podcasts.
Alec
kinda fell out of the spotlight for a little bit pre-30 Rock. But, when
he landed that gig, he swept back onto our televisions, and into our hearts. Oh
yeah, and then he became a media sensation as well. The last ten years have
been nothing but an amazing rollercoaster ride of Baldwin's life. We've seen
him ejected from a plane because he wouldn't turn off his phone while playing
Words with Friends. He's smattered Twitter with his opinions and comments (I'm
considering getting a Twitter account just to read his tirades). Then his
crazy-banana-pants stalker, who claimed she was married to him, made some
comments on Twitter; Baldwin retaliated by sicking his fans on the stalker via
Twitter. The woman promptly deleted her account.
Baldwin
courted the idea of running for mayor of New York, but I think he's set that on
the back-burner now as he's signed-on for a few more seasons of 30 Rock.
He's engaged to a lovely lady about 30 years his junior. And normally, in this
situation, a guy turns to another guy, hits him on the shoulder and says
"Good for him! Yeah! A girl in her 20s for a dude in his 50s!
*chauvinistic-lascivious-sexist-etc*" But, no sir. That lady is lucky
to be marrying Alec Baldwin. Shit, sorry Raven, but if Alec proposed to me, I'd
be filing the divorce papers an hour later. Those dreamy blue eyes... to
paraphrase 30 Rock: "the steely blue eyes of an ice dragon".
And it's with this lovely fiancé of his that the latest snafu has happened.
The
other day Mr. and the future-Mrs. Baldwin were leaving a building after having
applied for their marriage license when, as to be expected when you're awesome,
the parasitic paparazzi were there. They crammed their cameras in his face and
crowded in, a clear invasion of personal space, and didn't give them any room
to walk. Baldwin, as any would react in that situation, became defensive and
pushed them back. Yes, he got violent. He did physically push the paparazzo.
But, in a case such as this, when you deal with it so often, softly asking them
to leave you alone will get you nowhere. If that were effective, I think
celebrities everywhere wouldn't have the anger issues that we've seen. So,
Baldwin did what needed to be done.
In the picture, which is currently
my desktop wallpaper, look at Baldwin's mouth. I imagine that he's saying
"Fffff-f-frankly I'd prefer it if you took a step back." And I love
the look on the paparazzo's face. "Nyah! Oh, how dare he get angry at me
for invading his personal life?"
Aside
from just quietly asking them to leave you alone, I think that there's only one
way to solve this paparazzi problem. Here's my proposal that I'm going to
submit to the UN in their next summit.
Everyone
who is a paparazzo has to register to have a license. If you don't have a
license, you can't do it. If you're caught doing it without the license, it's
voyeurism and you get a hefty fine and jail time and have to register just like
sex offenders. Now, those who are registered get someone assigned to them. That
person then has the task of following the paparazzo around, taking pictures,
being invasive at all the inconvenient times. That way they know exactly what
it's like to experience the kind of offensive behavior that they subject their
victims to. It'll create jobs. For America. Next, we pass a bill that makes it
absolutely legal to attack a paparazzo if that person is doing their job. And
if they're causing a dangerous situation, potentially lethal (I'm thinking
Princess Diana, for those of you old enough to remember that fiasco), it is
absolutely legal to kill them in self-defense. Think of it as an addition to
the Stand Your Ground law. I put paparazzi down on the bottom of the list with
corrupt politicians/lawyers and other scum who make their living preying on
others. I think it is absolutely inexcusable, and if it has to happen, then
they need to pay for their reprehensible behavior. Is it really necessary to
know what Brad Pitt's current facial hair looks like when he goes for an outing
with his (20?) kids? If they make it public, do a press release or a story for
US Weekly, then it's fine. They've made that decision on their own. If they
want to share that information, then so be it. But these people need their
private lives too, damnit.
So,
if we get these rules shifted around, then I think celebrities would be
happier, we normal folk would get more entertainment for our buck, and the
paparazzi would get what they deserve. Win-win-win in my book.
No comments:
Post a Comment